John Finucane and the IRA Gibraltar Bombers

On March 6, 2018, John Finucane Tweeted about the IRA’s intending No-Warning Gibraltar Bombers – Mairead Farrell, Sean Savage and Daniel McCann – as follows:

In my opinion, there is certainly ‘remembrance’ of intending No-Warning terrorist bombers – there may even be ‘remembrance with dignity’ of intending No-Warning terrorist bombers – but there is only rarely and in a particular pro-IRA clique ‘remembrance with pride’ of intending No-Warning terrorist bombers.

Following the shooting of the IRA trio in Gibraltar, the IRA released a statement declaring that the trio were ‘on active service’ and had control of a 141lb SEMTEX bomb (64 kilos) which was later found in a car in an underground carpark in Marbella with two attached timing circuits set to explode after the would-be bombers would have long escaped the bomb site.

Here is a video of around only 100lbs of C4 (similar to SEMTEX) exploding – only two-thirds the size of the IRA bombers’ intended Gibraltar bomb:

The IRA’s intended bomb was half as large again as the bomb shown above.

It was surrounded by 10 kilos of Kalashnikov ammunition as extra shrapnel – hardly necessary given its size.

In the confines of the car park in Gibraltar where the IRA intended it to explode as British soldiers were disembarking from a bus, it would have vaporized anyone in the area – including soldiers, civilians, tourists – men, women and children.

Civilians from all over Europe and even from the United States and Canada routinely end up on trips from Spain to Gibraltar for tax free shopping and sightseeing and would have been walking and parking as the No-Warning Gibraltar bomb exploded.

The IRA wanted the entire world’s attention from possibly its single greatest atrocity – on a disputed British territory where British soldiers were preparing to parade – and as it had often done before – the IRA would have declared the world’s civilian casualties as “casualties of War” and not its problem…

[The intending bombers were killed in line with the IRA’s own Shoot to Kill practice – the IRA never had any qualms about shooting on or off duty police, soldiers, part-time soldiers, ex-part-time soldiers, prison officers, magistrates and judges and their wives and children, civilians declared informers and even canteen cooks chained to bombs…]

The intended Gibraltar bomb was a cowardly endeavour.

So, it is difficult for me to understand John Finucane’s expression of PRIDE in a phrase separated from his ‘remembered with dignity’ remark.

Where exactly is John’s pride landing?

Is he proud of the terrorists themselves separate from their intended No-Warning Gibraltar bomb?

Is he proud of the terrorists’ intended No-Warning Gibraltar bomb?

Is he proud of the whole IRA and terrorists and No-Warning Gibraltar bomb together as one entity?

John already recognises IRA terrorists as ‘ex-POWs’ – ex Prisoners of War – he clearly referenced IRA terrorists as Prisoners of War – and therefore possibly intends to express PRIDE in all of the IRA’s terrorists.

Or there may be some unexplained quibble which the Zombie Westminster Member of Parliament has failed to express or publish clarifying his PRIDE in the IRA’s No-Warning Gibraltar Bombers.

John appears to have difficulty in clearly expressing himself, possibly as a result of his lower educational achievement in university.

Here is the video of the Belfast Telegraph interview with John the Lawyer:

So, John – you can certainly have remembrance of No-Warning terrorist bombers – I suppose you can have dignified remembrance of No-Warning terrorist bombers – but how exactly are you expressing PRIDE in No-Warning Terrorist bombers whose atrocity would have exceeded all of the IRA’s previous No-Warning Bomb Outrages – Bloody Friday, Claudy, Birmingham, Guildford and Woolwich, Enniskillen, La Mon, Teebane – this list goes on and on…

It’s a fair question, John – please explain your PRIDE in IRA terrorist No-Warning Bombers…

Don’t the people deserve to know?

A longer article about our John.